The language of the table

I watched the glossy dollop of XO sauce splash directly onto a pristine mound of jasmine rice. Next to the plate, a bottle of mature Barolo stood like a Victorian schoolmaster who had wandered into a busy street market and kept talking anyway, certain that volume would substitute for comprehension. The cork had been extracted twenty minutes earlier, yet the bottle remained rigidly upright, sweating under the glare of the low-hanging dining room lamp, speaking a language nobody at the table had bothered to learn. The table was already crowded with small, steaming plates that showed absolutely no interest in Italian grammar, and even less patience for being asked to learn it mid-meal.

For decades, the standard text on wine appreciation has treated pairing as a sentence: subject, verb, object, one flavour waiting politely for the last to finish its clause. A great vintage is the protagonist, the kitchen its obedient supporting cast, each course arriving in careful syntax from left to right. This is a neat, comforting grammar. It works perfectly well when the food agrees to speak it.

But this table was fluent in something else entirely. Here, flavour was not a sentence; it was several conversations happening at once, in different registers, with no shared subject. A plate of cold, smacked cucumbers dripping with black vinegar sat beside a platter of soft-shell crabs dusted with white garlic. To the left, a bowl of braised pork belly wobbled under a glaze of five-spice and caramelised sugar. Nobody was waiting their turn to speak.

To survive here, wine has to unlearn the idea that its own grammar is universal. Much of traditional pairing advice is built on the assumption that harmony is a shared mother tongue, which is admirable until harmony quietly becomes correction. Spice, oil, fermentation, and texture are not unruly guests mangling the syntax. They are simply speaking their own dialect, and rather fluently.

Wine should not arrive to translate the plate, correct its grammar, or hand out footnotes. It might learn a little vocabulary before it begins to mingle.

The Barolo tried to hold forth early on, in its native tongue: limestone soils, autumnal mist, long maceration. The vinegar merely laughed, stripping the fruit bare and leaving the wine sounding foreign and faintly defensive - a heavy, leather-bound dictionary produced, uninvited, at a pub quiz, technically accurate and entirely unhelpful.

This is the dilemma facing wine wherever it travels beyond its own vocabulary. In Bangkok, Lima, or Lagos, the bottle doesn't get to bring its grammar with it and expect the table to conjugate around it. Each cuisine has its own logic, its own rules for volume and pause, and the wine's job is to pick up enough to be understood, not to insist the whole room learn its mother tongue for the evening. A Sancerre fluent at a Burgundian table can stand mute in front of a plate of nam prik, simply for never learning the local idiom. Fluency, not translation, is what travels - learned separately, market by market, plate by plate.

A shift occurred as the level in the bottle dropped. Stripped of its assumption that it set the terms, the wine began to behave less like an oration and more like a conversation. It stopped trying to match the weight of the food and simply cleared the road for it, dropping the formal register entirely. It wasn't dominating the five-spice; it was learning to say less, and better.

I did not bother with the crystal glasses we had been given. I poured the remaining wine into a thick-stemmed tumbler usually reserved for water. The Barolo looked happier there, less exposed to unsentimental judgment, no longer performing for an audience. It had stopped trying to teach the table its own vocabulary and settled for picking up a few words of the local slang.

It became useful, which is a far higher calling than being important.

The meal did not slow down to acknowledge any of this. A plate of wok-tossed greens arrived, smelling sharply of iron and smoke, shifting the register of the room once again. The bottle was empty now, its label stained with a dark fingerprint of soy sauce. It had survived the evening not by winning the argument, but by learning the table didn't need one.

Wine arrives to join the conversation. First, though, it has to accept the mildly uncomfortable truth that nobody at this particular table was ever waiting for a lecture in a language nobody had ordered.

Wine should be enjoyed. Drink responsibly.

Disclaimer: All links provided in this column are based on my own research and are not paid or sponsored.

© 2026 Shishir V. Baxi. All rights reserved. Reproduction or redistribution without permission is prohibited.